MORAL DUTY IN ADVERTISING
I think that advertisers should have a moral duty to avoid
stereotyping people because it is damaging to the way society thinks. Although
advertisements are a popular form of media, any form of media should be dealt
with responsibly so as not to promote any harmful ideas as we do live in a
world where our brains absorb a huge amount of information each day. Not to
mention that advertisements present ideas in a manner which is subtle and
does not reveal the message directly to the audience. For example, an advertisement
of axe body spray is about being clean and staying fresh. However, if the ad
had a male spraying it on him and then a flock of attractive women were to run
to him, it would be easy to say that the underlying meaning of this ad is that
all women crave a man (when this is not in fact true). This could be particularly
harmful to the way in which people view women, as this would render them as
more of a compliment to the man’s life than actual human being with their own
thoughts and ideas. Therefore, it can be said that advertisers do have a moral
duty to avoid stereotypes for the reason that it can oppress certain groups. Another
point to add would be that, with this projection of an image of what a group is
(in relation to a stereotype), this can influence others to think the same way.
Since advertisements are a mass-form of media, it can be accessible to anyone
anywhere of which means that a way of thinking can be efficiently forced into every
individual’s minds.
On the other hand, it is also worth noting the reasons why
advertisers do not always need to have the moral duty to not stereotype. For
example, if advertisers were to oppress white supremacists as a background to
an advertisement about bedsheets (as if comparing them to the KKK), this could
be particularly beneficial as it furthers the image that the clan was a
negative aspect of our world. In general, advertisers can choose two paths when
advertising their products; one that portrays every group equally, or one that suppresses
many. From this, one cannot help but ask why stereotypes in advertisements just
be avoided altogether. This way there would be no negative or positive messages
for any advertisement as it would purely be for the purpose of just selling a
product. However, the fall back of this is that society is too comfortable
allowing easy influences (such as an attractive person in an ad) to make their
decision of buying a product. Knowing this, another question is brought up–how
do you sell a product without using any of the popular ad-tricks? Should we
just have the product on a white background with a person narrating the
product? Even with this, which gender would you pick to narrate the product?
What if people take offense that the background is white?
In conclusion, society should push for advertisement agencies
to adjust the way they advertise their products to avoid stereotyping as this
would make people finally think of people as just “people” and not typecast. In
contrast, before any steps like these can be taken, advertisers would need to
know how to filter ads from stereotypes whilst also being able to effectively
sell their product, as many people in society have already fallen into their
stereotype due to the damaging effects of the past.
I think this is a very well written blog post. It explores not only one but both sides of wether or not ads should have a moral duty in what they publish. I think to make it more focused, you should take one stance on which side makes more sense to you and back it up with relevant points, as this will make your blog post stronger.
ReplyDelete